Retirees will face tough decisions with reverse mortgages

This article is reprinted by permission from NerdWallet.

The millions of Americans who havent saved enough money for retirement still have a potential safety net: their home equity. But recent changes to reverse mortgages mean seniors and their families may have tougher decisions to make.

Reverse mortgagesallow people 62 and older to tap theirhome equitywithout having to pay the money back until they move out, sell the house or die. Borrowers can take payouts as lump sums, monthly checks or through a line of credit that can be tapped at will. The reverse mortgage debt grows over time, typically at variable interest rates, and may deplete all the equity in the home, leaving nothing for heirs. If the home is worth less than the reverse mortgage balance, though, borrowers and their heirs cant be held responsible for that loss.

The loans earned a bad reputation as commission-hungry salespeople preyed on seniors who didnt understand the loans complexities or who had financial problems so severe that they quickly burned through the money. Another problem was unscrupulous advisers who urged people to use their equity to buy questionable investments, including expensive annuities.

Over the years, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, which oversees the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage program that insures most reverse mortgages, implemented changes that made the loans safer and, in some cases, cheaper.

Costs fell enough that fee-only financial planners who traditionally had shunned these loans started to recommend them to wealthier clients as a portfolio protection strategy. People could borrow against a reverse mortgage line of credit when markets were down, rather than selling shares at their lows. Research, much of it published in the influential Journal of Financial Planning, found the strategy allowed people to spend more with less risk of running out of money in retirement.

In October 2017, the Trump administration reduced the amount people could borrow and increased the costs, raising the upfront mortgage insurance premium for a line of credit from 0.5% to 2% of a homes value. HUD Secretary Ben Carson cited losses in the program and a need to put it on a more sustainable footing.

Read: New rules on reverse mortgages: smaller loans and higher costs

Using reverse mortgages for portfolio protection can still make sense, but the strategy is a harder sell now with the changes, says certified financial planner Michael Kitces of Columbia, Maryland, who was an early advocate of the strategy.

For a reasonably affluent client that has a $300,000 or $500,000 house, thats $6,000 to $10,000 of upfront costs just in case you might ever need the line of credit, Kitces says. Its just too much of a mental upfront hurdle for most clients.

Even before reverse mortgages became more expensive, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau warned last year against another strategy that some financial advisers were promoting: using the loans to delay claiming Social Security.

See: Should you use a reverse mortgage in retirement?

Social Security benefits grow about 7% to 8% each year theyre delayed after age 62, but the costs and risks of reverse mortgages generally exceed the cumulative lifetime benefits of bigger Social Security checks, the CFPB says. Borrowing money for living expenses early in retirement can mean theres not enough left to handle later financial shocks, such as long-term care.

The CFPB took action in 2016 against three reverse mortgage lenders for deceptive advertising that claimed people couldnt lose their homes. Although borrowers dont have to make monthly payments on the loans, they do have to keep up with property taxes, insurance and maintenance.

These days, reverse mortgages may be best suited for the way many people have traditionally used them: to pay off existing mortgages so they can eliminate monthly payments or to generate monthly income in retirement, says Wade Pfau, professor of retirement income at The American College of Financial Services in Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania. Those borrowers actually benefited from some of the changes, which included a reduction in annual insurance premiums on borrowed amounts.

You might like: Why new tax rules make Roth accounts better than ever

Your loan balance grows more slowly, which is good, says Pfau, the author of the recently updated book Reverse Mortgages.

The brief heyday of the portfolio protection strategy may have had a silver lining: It got more financial planners thinking about a product they used to shun. Kristi Sullivan, a certified financial planner in Denver, says she now talks to clients more often about reverse mortgages and the potential uses of home equity in retirement.

Some people are still reluctant to discuss the option, but more and more are open to listen and look at financial models using a reverse mortgage, Sullivan says.

More from NerdWallet: Millennials Are Good at Saving. But Investing? Not So Much How to Find Advice-Only Financial Advisors The 3 Reports You Havent Frozen Yet

Liz Weston is a writer at NerdWallet. Email: Twitter: @lizweston.

MarketWatch Partner Center
Most Popular Dow set to drop nearly 500 points as China hits back at U.S. with new tariffs European stocks fall as China pulls out big guns against U.S. tariffs Why Americans are avoiding the doctor China hits back with import tariffs on 106 U.S. products When it comes to retirement, 60s are the new 50s Mortgage Rates Powered by

This advertisement is provided by Bankrate, which compiles rate data from more than 4,800 financial institutions. Bankrate is paid by financial institutions whenever users click on display advertisements or on rate table listings enhanced with features like logos, navigation links, and toll free numbers. Dow Jones receives a share of these revenues when users click on a paid placement.

Data Provided By
Today’s Interest Rates Mortgage Equity Savings Auto Credit Cards 30 yr fixed Jum

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *