Author Archives: admin

Top 5 Growth Stocks To Watch For 2019

Drive Shack (NYSE:DS) is a golfing and soon to be leisure entertainment company that is priming itself for future growth through its Drive Shack brand that it has been developing. Over the past 2 years, what was formerly Newcastle Investment Corporation has been transforming itself into a corporation that owns golf courses and is also developing entertainment venues that focus more than just on traditional golf. To that end, New Castle Investment Corp. changed its name at the beginning of this year to Drive Shack and converted itself into a corporation from a REIT.

This article’s aim is to look at both the “legacy” golf courses and the future Drive Shack brand to get a sense of both current and future growth and profit.

Overall, third quarter 2017 results were a GAAP loss of 2 million (-$0.03 per share) and core earnings were 9 million ($0.13 per share).

Since DS has been transitioning over the past two years to a full golf course business from a REIT with interest income, year-over-year results are hard to compare for the overall numbers. However, the year-over-year golf course business can be compared for more clarity.

Top 5 Growth Stocks To Watch For 2019: Intuitive Surgical Inc.(ISRG)

Advisors’ Opinion:

  • [By Brian Stoffel]

    Investors in Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) know the script by now. The company forecasts solid — but not heady — procedure growth. When the end of the quarter comes, not only does it exceed expectations, but it also sells significantly more daVinci systems than it did the year before.

  • [By Danny Vena]

    Robotic surgery pioneer Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) has been a big winner, up 38% since the beginning of the year. Two companies that haven’t been so fortunate are footwear maker Skechers (NYSE:SKX) and flooring retailer Tile Shop Holdings (NASDAQ:TTS), which have fallen 18% and 13% year to date, respectively. Here are some key metrics to watch when these companies report earnings in July.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Caisse DE Depot ET Placement DU Quebec decreased its position in Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (NASDAQ:ISRG) by 21.3% in the 1st quarter, according to the company in its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The fund owned 1,921 shares of the medical equipment provider’s stock after selling 520 shares during the period. Caisse DE Depot ET Placement DU Quebec’s holdings in Intuitive Surgical were worth $793,000 as of its most recent SEC filing.

  • [By Anders Bylund]

    Shares of Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) rose 31.1% in the first half of 2018, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence. The maker of the da Vinci line of robotic surgery tools crushed Wall Street’s expectations in both of the earnings reports that were presented in this six-month span.

Top 5 Growth Stocks To Watch For 2019: Nordstrom Inc.(JWN)

Advisors’ Opinion:

  • [By Adam Levine-Weinberg]

    While the Hudson’s Bay balance sheet is in better shape now, its underlying operations are far from healthy. First, Lord & Taylor’s struggles go far beyond the flagship store that closed last month. The chain has experienced steady erosion of its customer base over the past few decades and has been unable to keep up with trendier rivals like Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN).

  • [By JJ Kinahan]

    The news wasn’t all good early Thursday. Results from J.C. Penney Company Inc. (NYSE: JCP) appeared to disappoint investors, who sent shares down more than 11 percent in pre-market futures trading. The company said in a press release that its overall top-line sales came in below management’s expectations, blaming cold April weather. We’re not done with retail yet. Nordstrom, Inc. (NYSE: JWN) reports after the close today.

  • [By Jeremy Bowman]

    Shares of Nordstrom Inc. (NYSE:JWN) were heading lower today after the department store chain turned in a disappointing first-quarter earnings report with comparable sales coming in lower than expected. As a result, the stock was down 9.2% as of 11:17 a.m. EDT. 

  • [By JJ Kinahan]

    This week brings a string of retail results with reports from Walmart Inc. (NYSE: WMT) on Thursday morning and Nordstrom, Inc. (NYSE: JWN) after market close the same day. Next week, big-box retailer Target Corporation (NYSE: TGT) and home improvement retailer Lowe’s Companie, Inc. (NYSE: LOW) both report before market open on Wednesday, May 23. For a look at what else is going on across markets, check out today’s market update if you have time.

  • [By ]

    On Thursday, earnings are expected from JCPenney Co. (JCP) , Action Alerts PLUS holding Nordstrom Inc. (JWN) , Nintendo Co. (NTDOY) and Walmart Inc. (WMT) .

  • [By Adam Levine-Weinberg]

    After spending several years in the doghouse, department stores have come back into favor among investors during the past year. Shares of better-performing department store operators like Kohl’s (NYSE:KSS), Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN), and Macy’s (NYSE:M) have achieved huge gains since last fall.

Top 5 Growth Stocks To Watch For 2019: MEDIFAST INC(MED)

Advisors’ Opinion:

  • [By Lisa Levin]

    Medifast, Inc. (NYSE: MED) shares were also up, gaining 22 percent to $121.06 after the company reported strong Q1 results and raised its FY18 guidance.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    MediBloc (CURRENCY:MED) traded 6.8% lower against the dollar during the 1-day period ending at 15:00 PM Eastern on May 27th. MediBloc has a total market cap of $73.40 million and $743,880.00 worth of MediBloc was traded on exchanges in the last 24 hours. One MediBloc token can currently be purchased for approximately $0.0247 or 0.00000339 BTC on major cryptocurrency exchanges including Bibox, Gate.io and Coinrail. During the last seven days, MediBloc has traded 8.3% higher against the dollar.

  • [By Lisa Levin] Gainers
    Biostar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: BSPM) shares rose 35.8 percent to $3.00.
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVGI) shares surged 32 percent to $8.94 after reporting upbeat Q1 earnings.
    Carbon Black, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBLK) gained 29.6 percent to $24.62. Carbon Black priced its IPO at $19 per share.
    California Resources Corporation (NYSE: CRC) shares rose 26.8 percent to $32.70 following upbeat Q1 earnings.
    Pandora Media, Inc. (NYSE: P) gained 25 percent to $7.185 after reporting strong quarterly results.
    Medifast, Inc. (NYSE: MED) shares climbed 23.7 percent to $122.87 after the company reported strong Q1 results and raised its FY18 guidance.
    Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (NYSE: NGVC) rose 23.2 percent to $8.4999 after reporting Q2 results.
    Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: PTLA) gained 22.2 percent to $41.27 after the FDA approved the company's Andexxa, the only antidote indicated for patients treated with rivaroxaban and apixaban.
    Shake Shack Inc (NYSE: SHAK) rose 22.2 percent to $57.955 after the company reported upbeat results for its first quarter and raised its FY18 guidance.
    Atomera Incorporated (NASDAQ: ATOM) jumped 19.7 percent to $6.12 after reporting Q1 results.
    Super Micro Computer, Inc. (NASDAQ: SMCI) rose 16.4 percent to $21.00 after reporting strong preliminary results for the third quarter.
    Titan International, Inc. (NYSE: TWI) shares rose 16.4 percent to $12.21 following Q1 earnings.
    Integer Holdings Corporation (NYSE: ITGR) shares gained 14.9 percent to $63.75 following Q1 results.
    Control4 Corporation (NASDAQ: CTRL) shares climbed 14.5 percent to $23.98 folloiwng strong Q1 results.
    B&G Foods, Inc. (NYSE: BGS) climbed 12.6 percent to $25.40 after reporting Q1 earnings.
    HMS Holdings Corp (NASDAQ: HMSY) shares gained 10 percent to $19.59 after reporting upbeat quarterly earnings.
    Viavi Solutions Inc. (NASDAQ: VIAV) rose 7 percent to $10.09 following Q3 r

Top 5 Growth Stocks To Watch For 2019: TrueBlue Inc.(TBI)

Advisors’ Opinion:

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Media stories about Trueblue (NYSE:TBI) have trended somewhat positive on Monday, according to Accern Sentiment. The research firm rates the sentiment of news coverage by reviewing more than 20 million news and blog sources in real time. Accern ranks coverage of publicly-traded companies on a scale of negative one to one, with scores closest to one being the most favorable. Trueblue earned a media sentiment score of 0.09 on Accern’s scale. Accern also assigned media stories about the business services provider an impact score of 45.3296498009881 out of 100, meaning that recent news coverage is somewhat unlikely to have an effect on the stock’s share price in the near future.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Trueblue (NYSE: TBI) is one of 23 public companies in the “Help supply services” industry, but how does it contrast to its rivals? We will compare Trueblue to similar businesses based on the strength of its analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    American Century Companies Inc. grew its holdings in shares of Trueblue Inc (NYSE:TBI) by 24.4% in the 1st quarter, according to its most recent disclosure with the SEC. The fund owned 95,307 shares of the business services provider’s stock after purchasing an additional 18,680 shares during the period. American Century Companies Inc. owned approximately 0.23% of Trueblue worth $2,468,000 as of its most recent SEC filing.

  • [By Motley Fool Transcribers]

    TrueBlue Inc  (NYSE:TBI)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 07, 2019, 5:00 p.m. ET

    Contents:
    Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants
    Prepared Remarks:

    Operator

Top 5 Growth Stocks To Watch For 2019: Buffalo Wild Wings Inc.(BWLD)

Advisors’ Opinion:

  • [By Steve Symington]

    That’s not to say it was a quiet day for every stock on the market. With earnings season ramping up, brewing giant Anheuser-Busch InBev (NYSE:BUD) and restaurant chain Buffalo Wild Wings (NASDAQ:BWLD) served as an exercise in contrast as investors reacted to their respective quarterly reports.

  • [By Peter Graham]

    A long term performance chart shows Dave & Busters Entertainment tripling in value before falling back while small cap upscale gentlemen’s clubs and restaurant owner RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: RICK) began taking off in 2016 and small cap Buffalo Wild Wings (NASDAQ: BWLD) is being acquired by Arby’s Restaurant Group:

Netflix Inc (NFLX) CEO Reed Hastings Sold $19.7 million of Shares

CEO of Netflix Inc (NASDAQ:NFLX) Reed Hastings sold 54,418 shares of NFLX on 02/19/2019 at an average price of $362 a share. The total sale was $19.7 million.

Netflix Inc provides multimedia content through the internet. It provides a subscription based platform for television shows, movies and original series. Netflix Inc has a market cap of $157.14 billion; its shares were traded at around $359.91 with a P/E ratio of 134.80 and P/S ratio of 10.30. Netflix Inc had annual average EBITDA growth of 13.00% over the past ten years.

CEO Recent Trades:

CEO Reed Hastings sold 54,418 shares of NFLX stock on 02/19/2019 at the average price of $362. The price of the stock has decreased by 0.58% since.CEO Reed Hastings sold 67,907 shares of NFLX stock on 01/22/2019 at the average price of $328.17. The price of the stock has increased by 9.67% since.

Directors and Officers Recent Trades:

Director Anne M Sweeney sold 342 shares of NFLX stock on 02/14/2019 at the average price of $360. The price of the stock has decreased by 0.02% since.Director Anne M Sweeney sold 7,607 shares of NFLX stock on 02/12/2019 at the average price of $360. The price of the stock has decreased by 0.02% since.

For the complete insider trading history of NFLX, click here

.

16 Nifty companies beat the Street in Q3; should you buy, sell or hold?

India Inc’s December quarter results witnessed headwinds given the tight liquidity situation, currency volatility, slowdown in government spending ahead of elections and global trade issues.

Out of the 50 Nifty companies, 16 (32%) reported numbers above expectations, 15 companies’ (30%) results were in-line with expectations, 10 (20%) reported mixed set of numbers and 9 companies (18%) were below estimates, Centrum Wealth Research said in a report.

The earnings growth of corporates during Q3FY19 faced headwinds given macro challenges (such as weak rupee, elevated crude oil prices and higher bond yields) and micro challenges (given the delay in order finalisation owing to upcoming elections, weak consumer sentiment and tight liquidity).

Given the current market scenario, the earnings reported by companies suggest a gradual recovery setting in, said the report. But, sustenance of the same would be a key monitorable along with the demand scenario during the pre-election period.

related news Trade Setup for Thursday: Top 15 things to know before Opening Bell Technical View: Nifty forms bullish candle, snaps 8-day fall; next target seen around 10,890

Here is a list of 16 companies which have reported December quarter results which were higher than consensus estimates:

image

Here are recommendations by various brokerages on these stocks.

Zee Entertainment: Buy| Target: Rs 575

Zee Entertainment’s numbers for the quarter were ahead of consensus estimates which prompted some global brokerage firms such as HSBC and Citigroup to raise its 12-month target price.

Zee registered a 50.3 percent jump in its Q3FY19 net profit to Rs 562.7 crore against Rs 374 crore in the same quarter last fiscal. Revenue of the company was up 17.9 percent at Rs 2,167 crore against Rs 1,838 crore.

Citigroup maintained buy call on Zee post Q3 results and raised its 12-month target price to Rs 575 from Rs 550 earlier. The global investment bank has also raised estimates to post the strong Q3 beat by 5-8 percent. The stock is Citi’s preferred pick as the core TV business remains strong.

“We are seeing some encouraging trends on zee5 which makes an interesting play on online video theme, said the report. Going forward, induction of a strategic partner could be positive for minorities,” added the report.

Reliance Industries: Buy| Target: Rs 1500

Analysts at several brokerage firms believe that Reliance Industries’ Q3 performance was largely better-than-expected, but there was a surprise element in the petchem show.

CLSA maintained its buy rating with a target price of Rs 1500 as RIL’s Q3 performance beat estimates across segments other than petchem. It said that the retail performance was stellar. Weak petchem was offset by a strong performance by other segments, analysts at the firm wrote in their research note.

Further, the retail earnings before interest and taxes more than trebled year on year, while consolidated capital expenditure fell 30 percent QoQ. CLSA also believes that Jio may close a deal within H1CY19 to monetise its tower & fibre assets.

(Disclaimer: Reliance Industries Ltd. is the sole beneficiary of Independent Media Trust which controls Network18 Media & Investments Ltd.)

Asian Paints: Buy| Target: Rs 1580

Macquarie upgraded Asian Paints to outperform rating post December quarter results and also raised its 12-month target price to Rs 1580 from Rs 1180 earlier.

Volume growth has picked up significantly, and the volume growth outlook has also improved which is a positive sign.

The recent price increases with falling input costs will improve margins, said the Macquarie note. The global investment bank also raised FY19-21 EPS estimates by 7-16 percent. The full effect of lower GST rates yet to play out, added the note.

Larsen & Toubro: Buy| Target: Rs 1786

Morgan Stanley maintained its overweight rating on L&T post December quarter results. The global investment bank expects relief rally as the market was worried about the cut in order inflow and revenue guidance.

The December quarter demonstrates the core strengths of L&T’s business model. The company has diversified order book, strong execution track record, and reasonably strong balance sheet.

HCL Technologies: Buy| Target Rs 1380

CLSA maintained its buy rating on HCL Technologies post-December quarter results and hiked its target price to Rs 1380 from Rs 1350 earlier.

The company recorded a sharp revenue beat, and rebound in organic growth is also positive for the company. Margins remains soft as management continues to trade margins for growth.

The stock is a good buy for rebounding organic growth, IP value as well as cheap valuations, said the CLSA note.

Dr Reddy’s Laboratories: Outperform| Target: Rs 3200

CLSA retained its outperform rating on CLSA post December quarter results and raised its target price to Rs 3200 from Rs 2850 earlier.

The cost controls continue to deliver, and a revival in the US growth in FY20 will be a key catalyst. The earnings beat was largely driven by cost-control initiatives.

The US sales improved by 4 percent on a quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) basis and US pricing dynamics remained stable. The global investment bank increased FY19-21 EPS estimates by 2-9 percent.

GAIL India: Buy| Target: Rs 420

CLSA maintained its buy rating on GAIL India post December quarter results but slashed its target price to Rs 420 from Rs 465.

U.S. LNG arbitrage may stay negative through 2019. The upcoming quarterly results may be quite weak. Futures suggest U.S. LNG will be at a significant premium to Asian spot LNG price, said the CLSA note.

Tech Mahindra: Buy| Target: Rs 880

Centrum maintained its buy rating on Tech Mahindra post December quarter results with a target price of Rs 880. Tech Mahindra’s December quarter results beat our estimates on top-line, EBITDA margin and PAT.

“We expect Tech M to deliver 4.7% USD revenue growth in FY19E. Though Telecom vertical is showing traction over the past two quarters, we expect the Telecom vertical revenues to decline by 1 percent YoY for FY19E,” said the report.

Tech Mahindra trades at 30 percent discount to Infosys. The potential for growth acceleration in FY20E led by Telecom revival and cheap valuations leads us to remain bullish. “We value Tech M at 14x FY21E EPS, which yields a TP of Rs880/sh. Resume coverage with a Buy rating,” said the report.

Sun Pharma: Buy| Target: Rs 560

Most global brokerage firms have maintained buy recommendation on Sun Pharma after India’s largest drugmaker said its net profit jumped 286.1 percent to Rs 1,241.1 crore in the third quarter ended December 2018.

Global brokerage firms have a target price in the range of Rs 535-560 on Sun Pharma which translates into an upside of 22-28 percent return in the next 12 months.

CLSA which marinated its buy rating on Sun Pharma post Q3 results recommends a target price of Rs 560. The December quarter results were good even after adjustments.

Coal India: Buy| Target: Rs 275

CLSA maintained its buy rating on Coal India post December quarter results but slashed its target price to Rs 275 from Rs 310, maintaining the buy rating. The demand outlook looks decent, according to CLSA. CLSA cut its FY19-21 EPS estimates for Coal India by 3-5 percent due to lower volumes.

Oil & Natural Gas Corporation: Buy| Target: Rs 180

HSBC maintained its buy rating on ONGC post December quarter results with a target price of Rs 180. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation posted a 64.8 percent jump in third-quarter profit, boosted by higher revenue from offshore operations.

Its profit increased sharply to Rs 8,263 crore in the quarter ended December 2018, from Rs 5,015 crore a year earlier and revenue from operations climbed over 20 percent to Rs 27,694 crore, while revenue from offshore operations rose 19.1 percent, ONGC said.

Current oil prices put ONGC in a sweet spot, the brokerage said, adding rising gas production & gas prices are expected to drive earnings growth.

image (1)

Kotak Mahindra Bank: Buy| Target: Rs 1500

Analysts largely remain positive on Kotak Mahindra Bank’s Q3 performance, but believe that its subsidiaries show was a key negative. They remain upbeat on the banking business.

CLSA maintained its buy rating on Kotak Bank with a target price of Rs 1500 and said that it sees 21 percent CAGR in its standalone earnings. The key positive from results was 23 percent growth in net interest income (NII), led by a 23 percent rise in loans. Better growth and RoE improvement remain key in sustaining premium valuations.

State Bank of India: Buy| Target: Rs 380

CLSA retained its buy call but raised the target price to Rs 380 from Rs 370 earlier.

SBI is the preferred pick among PSUs, said the note from CLSA. The profit was ahead of estimates which was aided by higher treasury gains. The key positive was the decline in slippages.

Bajaj Finserv: Buy| Target: 6900

Sharekhan maintained its buy rating on Bajaj Finserv post December quarter results with a target price of Rs 6900. Bajaj Finserv (BFS) posted modest overall performance in Q3FY2019.

The lending subsidiary, Bajaj Finance Limited (BFL) posted a strong set of numbers for Q3FY2019.

The life insurance business, BALIC, and BAGIC (the general insurance business) saw subdued PAT performance despite strong overall growth as the company had to make provisions against an expected loss of one investment.

Bajaj Finance: Buy| Target: Rs 3000

JM Financial maintained its buy rating on Bajaj Finance with a target price of Rs 3000 post December quarter results. Bajaj Finance (BAF) delivered a stellar performance in a tough liquidity environment.

“Going forward, BAF remains well-positioned to deliver sustainable profitable growth driven by a) strong customer acquisition engine, b) increasing rural footprint with diversified product offering, c) rising contribution of fee income, d) superior asset quality and e) well capitalised with CAR of 21 percent,” said the report.

Axis Bank: Buy| Target Rs 730

Centrum upgraded Axis Bank to buy from hold earlier post December quarter results and raised its target from Rs 560 to Rs 730. The main reasons: a) better-than-estimated revenue, core-operating profit and earnings, b) reduction in the pool of stressed assets/healthy provision coverage ratio, c) strong capital position and d) promising start under the new MD and CEO, Mr. Amitabh Chaudhry.

Axis Bank has identified key focus areas and has laid out an ambitious target to achieve 18% RoE in the medium term. Improved micros and favourable macros will translate into enhanced RoE of 15.6% by end-FY21E.

Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment expert on moneycontrol.com are his own, and not that of the website or its management. Moneycontrol.com advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions.
First Published on Feb 21, 2019 10:06 am

Top Clean Energy Stocks To Watch For 2019

Natural gas for transportation leader Clean Energy Fuels Corp (NASDAQ:CLNE) has steadily grown and improved the quality of its business and business results over the past several years. Today’s Clean Energy Fuels is leaner, has a stronger balance sheet, and is in a solid position as a market leader in a growth industry. 

But is the stock undervalued? By one metric, book value per share, it looks downright cheap. But management used a massive amount of stock to make ends meet over the past 18 months, destroying a significant amount of shareholder value in the process. Still, the loss of an important tax credit will have multimillion-dollar implications, and the sale of a very profitable part of the business raises questions about the company’s ability to generate positive cash flows this year. 

Image source: Getty Images.

Top Clean Energy Stocks To Watch For 2019: Nordstrom Inc.(JWN)

Advisors’ Opinion:

  • [By Chris Lange]

    Nordstrom Inc. (NYSE: JWN) released its fiscal first-quarter financial results after the markets closed on Thursday. The retailer said that it had $0.51 in earnings per share (EPS) on $3.56 billion in revenue, compared with consensus estimates from Thomson Reuters that called for $0.44 in EPS on revenue of $3.46 billion. The same period of last year reportedly had EPS of $0.37 and $3.35 billion in revenue.

  • [By ]

    Retail earnings continue on Thursday with Walmart (WMT) , Nordstrom (JWN) and JC Penney (JCP) all reporting. Cramer was looking for good things from Walmart and Nordstrom, but said Penney just doesn’t have anything to set itself apart from the pack. Also on Thursday, Applied Materials (AMAT) , which should be able to mount a rally with the semiconductor stocks being hot recently.

  • [By Chris Lange]

    Look for Nordstrom Inc. (NYSE: JWN) to reveal its fiscal fourth-quarter results on Thursday as well. The consensus analyst estimates are $1.25 in EPS and revenue of $4.62 billion. Shares of Nordstrom closed at $53.56 on Friday, above the consensus price target of $49.94. The 52-week range is $37.79 to $54.00.

  • [By Jeremy Bowman]

    Shares of Nordstrom, Inc. (NYSE:JWN) are popping today, up 11.2% as of noon EDT, after the department-store chain turned in an impressive second-quarter earnings report. The high-end retailer showed off strong growth in digital sales and quelled concerns that arose in July when it cut its full-year sales guidance.

Top Clean Energy Stocks To Watch For 2019: Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated(RBA)

Advisors’ Opinion:

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Inc (NYSE:RBA) (TSE:RBA) shares reached a new 52-week high and low on Tuesday . The stock traded as low as $36.00 and last traded at $35.65, with a volume of 9678 shares traded. The stock had previously closed at $35.71.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (NYSE:RBA) (TSE:RBA) announced a quarterly dividend on Thursday, May 10th, Zacks reports. Shareholders of record on Wednesday, May 30th will be paid a dividend of 0.17 per share by the business services provider on Wednesday, June 20th. This represents a $0.68 annualized dividend and a yield of 2.05%. The ex-dividend date is Tuesday, May 29th.

  • [By Motley Fool Transcribers]

    Ritchie Brothers Auctioneers Inc (NYSE:RBA)Q2 2018 Earnings Conference CallAug. 10, 2018, 11:00 a.m. ET

    Contents:
    Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants
    Prepared Remarks:

    Operator

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Lisa Levin]

     

    Companies Reporting After The Bell
    NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ: NVDA) is estimated to post quarterly earnings at $1.45 per share on revenue of $2.89 billion.
    News Corporation (NASDAQ: NWSA) is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.07 per share on revenue of $1.99 billion.
    Symantec Corporation (NASDAQ: SYMC) is estimated to post quarterly earnings at $0.39 per share on revenue of $1.19 billion.
    Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (NASDAQ: PPC) is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.54 per share on revenue of $2.65 billion.
    Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. (NYSE: HE) is expected to post quarterly earnings at $0.38 per share on revenue of $556.81 million.
    Air Lease Corporation (NYSE: AL) is estimated to post quarterly earnings at $1.01 per share on revenue of $383.37 million.
    Flowserve Corporation (NYSE: FLS) is expected to post quarterly earnings at $0.27 per share on revenue of $880.89 million.
    Civitas Solutions, Inc. (NYSE: CIVI) is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.12 per share on revenue of $396.25 million.
    The Trade Desk, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTD) is estimated to post quarterly earnings at $0.1 per share on revenue of $73.23 million.
    Amdocs Limited (NYSE: DOX) is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.95 per share on revenue of $980.50 million.
    Yelp Inc. (NYSE: YELP) is estimated to post quarterly loss at $0.04 per share on revenue of $220.14 million.
    Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: KLIC) is expected to post quarterly earnings at $0.43 per share on revenue of $210.01 million.
    TiVo Corporation (NASDAQ: TIVO) is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.37 per share on revenue of $198.62 million.
    Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (NYSE: RBA) is expected to post quarterly earnings at $0.17 per share on revenue of $153.87 million.
    Uniti Group Inc. (NASDAQ: UNIT) is estimated to post quarterly earnings at $0.01 per share on revenue of $247.16 million.
    Jagged Peak En

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Top Clean Energy Stocks To Watch For 2019: Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.(CFR)

Advisors’ Opinion:

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Media headlines about Cullen/Frost Bankers (NYSE:CFR) have trended somewhat negative recently, Accern Sentiment reports. The research firm identifies positive and negative news coverage by analyzing more than twenty million news and blog sources in real-time. Accern ranks coverage of public companies on a scale of -1 to 1, with scores closest to one being the most favorable. Cullen/Frost Bankers earned a news sentiment score of -0.02 on Accern’s scale. Accern also gave news headlines about the bank an impact score of 46.2536959953036 out of 100, indicating that recent news coverage is somewhat unlikely to have an effect on the stock’s share price in the immediate future.

  • [By Anders Bylund, Jason Hall, Danny Vena, Jordan Wathen, and Brian Feroldi]

    In that spirit, we asked a few of our Motley Fool investors what they see as the best investment ideas at the start of July, 2018. They were quick to suggest Chinese e-commerce giant Baidu (NASDAQ:BIDU), coffee giant Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX), clean energy specialist TerraForm Power (NASDAQ:TERP), semiconductor veteran Intel, (NASDAQ:INTC), and Texan bank Cullen/Frost Bankers (NYSE:CFR).

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Cullen/Frost Bankers (CFR)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Cullen/Frost Bankers (CFR)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    TRADEMARK VIOLATION WARNING: “Cullen Frost Bankers Inc. Boosts Stake in Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (CFR)” was reported by Ticker Report and is owned by of Ticker Report. If you are reading this article on another domain, it was stolen and reposted in violation of United States and international trademark & copyright laws. The correct version of this article can be read at www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4153655/cullen-frost-bankers-inc-boosts-stake-in-cullen-frost-bankers-inc-cfr.html.

Top Clean Energy Stocks To Watch For 2019: Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corporation(TYG)

Advisors’ Opinion:

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    UBS Group AG lifted its holdings in shares of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp. (NYSE:TYG) by 5.5% in the first quarter, according to the company in its most recent filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The fund owned 205,851 shares of the financial services provider’s stock after buying an additional 10,728 shares during the period. UBS Group AG owned 0.42% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure worth $5,142,000 at the end of the most recent reporting period.

Top Clean Energy Stocks To Watch For 2019: Hudson Global, Inc.(HSON)

Advisors’ Opinion:

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    JBF Capital Inc. purchased a new position in Hudson Global Inc (NASDAQ:HSON) in the second quarter, Holdings Channel reports. The fund purchased 157,917 shares of the business services provider’s stock, valued at approximately $256,000.

Top Clean Energy Stocks To Watch For 2019: Perceptron, Inc.(PRCP)

Advisors’ Opinion:

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Perceptron (NASDAQ: PRCP) and II-VI (NASDAQ:IIVI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Topcon (OTCMKTS: TOPCF) and Perceptron (NASDAQ:PRCP) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Perceptron (NASDAQ: PRCP) and CyberOptics (NASDAQ:CYBE) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Air Lease Corp (AL) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Air Lease Corp  (NYSE:AL)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 21, 2019, 4:30 p.m. ET

Contents:
Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants
Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good day ladies and gentlemen and welcome to Air Lease’s Fourth Quarter 2018 Earnings conference Call. At this time all lines are in a listen-only mode. Later there will be a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. (Operator Instructions) And as a reminder today’s call is being recorded for replay purposes.

I’d now like to hand the conference over to Mary Liz DePalma Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Mary Liz DePalma — Head of Investor Relations

Thank you. Hello everyone and welcome to Air Lease Corporation’s fourth quarter and year-end 2018 earnings call. This is Mary Liz DePalma and I’m joined this afternoon by Steve Hazy our Executive Chairman; John Plueger our Chief Executive Officer and President; and Greg Willis our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Earlier today we published our fourth quarter and year-end 2018 results. A copy of our earnings release is available on the Investors section of our website at www.airleasecorp.com. This conference call is being webcast and recorded today Thursday, February 21, 2019 and the webcast will be available for replay on our website.

At this time all participants of this call are in listen-only mode. At the conclusion of today’s conference call, instructions will be given for the Q&A session. Before we begin, please note that certain statements in this conference call, including certain answers to your questions are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. This includes, without limitation, statements regarding our future operations and performance, revenues, operating expenses, stock-based compensation expense and other income and expense items. These statements and any projections as to the Company’s future performance represent management’s estimates of future results and speak only as of today February 21, 2019. These estimates involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. Please refer to our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for a more detailed description of risk factors that may affect our results.

Air Lease Corporation assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements or information in light of new information or future events. In addition, certain financial measures we will be using during the call such as adjusted net income before income taxes, adjusted diluted earnings per share before income taxes and adjusted pre-tax return on equity are non-GAAP measures. Our description of our reasons for utilizing these non-GAAP measures as well as our definition of them and the reconciliation to corresponding GAAP measures can be found in our earnings release and 10-K issued today. This release can be found in both Investors and Press section of our website at www.airleasecorp.com. Unauthorized recording of this conference call is not permitted.

I would now like to turn the call over to our CEO and President John Plueger.

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks Mary Liz. Well good afternoon to all of you and thank you for joining us. I’m happy to report that Air Lease enjoyed another good quarter and year. For the fourth quarter, we recorded diluted earnings per share of $1.24. Our revenues were up 13% over last year’s fourth quarter and our portfolio metrics remained strong and consistent. Our balance sheet grew to $18.5 billion with 275 owned aircraft at the end of the year. During the quarter we took delivery of 12 new aircraft from our order book and sold five aircraft, two Thunderbolt II, one to Blackbird Capital II and two aircraft to third-party buyers.

One of our scheduled fourth quarter order book aircraft did slip into Q1 this year as we are still experiencing delivery delays from Airbus, which we anticipate will continue through the first half of 2020. For the full year 2018, we achieved diluted earnings per share of $4.60, a pre-tax margin of 38.1%, a 14.3% pre-tax return on equity and $1.25 billion of operating cash flow. It was truly a busy and productive year, including a significant new order for Boeing aircraft that we announced at the Farnborough Air Show, robust single and twin-aisle lease placements to our ever-expanding customer base, which Steve will highlight with you; considerable success in the debt capital markets issuing $3 billion in unsecured and senior unsecured notes and expanding our bank facilities and of course closing our highly successful Thunderbolt II midlife aircraft management platform.

ALC now stands with 708 aircraft owned, managed and on from order. We have 91% of our order book placed on long-term leases through 2020 with no change to-date in the good pace of forward lease placements. As a result of our placement progress, ALC continues to have significant forward visibility with almost $26 billion in total committed rentals. So with 2018 behind us, how is 2019 looking so far? Well first and foremost we are excited because 2019 will be a high growth year for ALC with 80 aircraft delivering all of which are under long-term profitable lease contracts. That growth will be funded by a prudent combination of our liquidity including operating cash flow, senior unsecured notes issuance, expanding bank and capital markets access and aircraft sales.

Greg will review with you further on the progress we’ve already made on the debt capital markets side and our funding plan. On the aircraft sales side, demand from buyers remains strong. For example since the beginning of there, we have met with a very significant number of qualified potential buyers, most of whom reached out to us. We also told you last quarter we were contemplating another Thunderbolt transaction and work on that is ongoing. Having said that the diversified fire base we have for our aircraft allows us to be not dependent on any individual sales channels or structure such as the ABS market. Furthermore let me remind you that our Blackbird Capital II joint venture provide us with adjunct capital to take advantage of opportunistic transactions as they may arise and provides an ongoing avenue for management of customer concentration.

In summary suffice to say that we remain diligent in all regards as it relates to financing and sales and that the growth ahead of us will be achieved without sacrifice to our key financial targets and investment grade ratings.

Second, looking at 2019, overall lease demand remains robust fueled by continued global passenger growth and replacement of aging aircraft. We do not see that any signs of potential slowing of global economic growth is impacting the airline marketplace or demand for our aircraft. We have made good progress on lease placements this year including China as you will continue to see from our press releases.

Yes the leasing market is highly competitive but that has been the case for several years now and you see our fulfillment metrics remain consistent. We still see our key order book competitors and the major players being rational and disciplined. Remember a key metric is lease rate factor versus just a lease rate itself as this is a function of what you get in lease rate versus what the aircraft cost you. And we believe our aircraft cost base is from our large-scale and evolving order book gives us a key competitive advantage. Also remember that the lease rate is not the only economic element in a lease transaction.

For example return conditions are also important in the total economic equation and may change the value of the aircraft and we continue to remain disciplined in this area. As we predicted, we believe the over-saturated sale-leaseback market is showing signs of slowing and we have not really seen any more significant new entrants from China in the leasing space for well over a year now. Let me remind you that ALC is not a player in the sale-leaseback market and our order book model means that we control the new aircraft positions which on an overall basis still remain in short supply.

Third for 2019, the health of our global airline customers remains positive overall. Yes there will be further airline failures this year as we’ve seen with Germania for example where ALC had no aircraft on lease and no exposure as with that insolvency filing. Looking back in history, almost every year we see airline bankruptcies and that is the same view looking forward. The airliner landscape continues to evolve primarily with the expansion of low-cost and ultra-low-cost carriers. Airlines large and small need to continue to determine their business model, their niche, and the strength. Some fail in this task, which brings me to a key point. ALC has prudent risk management practices in place.

Our views on placing aircraft with a specific airline and how each lease is constructed is built from decades of experience. As far as airlines in the risk headlines today we have no aircraft at Avianca Brazil, none in Jet Airways, none in Norwegian and none at Germania as I mentioned earlier. And we protect our existing business and leases with security deposits and maintenance reserves. We don’t always get it perfect, but as we stated before biggest risk (inaudible) is the quality of your aircraft, picking the most modern, young widely distributed aircraft in the world. Where we do run into problems such as the Primera, Denmark last year we had no aircraft delivered there, but rather have four commitments, which we’ll able to lease elsewhere.

Fourth, we do remain watchful on several important industrial areas, specifically the industrial recovery Airbus, stabilization of new generation engine technical problems and overall production rates of the OEMs. We continue to receive delay notices from Airbus and recently there have been some accessory, gearbox and other issues in the Pratt & Whitney geared turbofan engine, which continue to impact our customers. While we believe that Airbus has their industrial recovery plan in place and that Pratt & Whitney are getting their arms around these issues, we fall just short of saying that these problems are fully behind us. And as we have stated for quite some time now we remain concerned about the global supply chain requirements for ongoing ramp-up in single aisle production rates.

Fifth and finally for 2019 we continue to work with both Boeing and Airbus on new aircraft programs specifically the NMA or 797 at Boeing and A321XLR at Airbus. There are still key decisions to be made across all fronts on these programs and ALC continues to evaluate the merits and market potential of these potential new aircraft types. The absorption of the CSeries by Airbus and E-Jet program by Boeing does bring a new dynamic to the lower-end aircraft size of the marketplace and ALC continues to evaluate these products and their role in the global marketplace. We’ve reached no decisions yet, but we are studying closely.

Let me close by thanking our best-in-class team at Air Lease here for another year of award-winning work. And award-winning is correct. We received many awards for 2018. As well a special thanks to our Board of Directors, our suppliers, financiers, joint venture partners, customers and investors for their continued belief and support in Air Lease Corporation.

Let me now turn this over to our Executive Chairman, Steve Hazy to provide his commentary and color. Steve?

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy — Executive Chairman of the Board

Thanks John. We are extremely pleased with the results our fourth quarter and the full year 2018 and I too would like to thank the Air Lease team for their professionalism and dedication which continues to differentiate ALC in the industry. I do not need to tell any of you that 2018 was an interesting year with various attention-grabbing headlines. We saw interest rates rise and volatility in oil prices. Along with you all we read headlines on trade and as typical we saw some airlines run into difficulty. Despite questions and concerns on all of these items one important item prevailed, the global growth in air passenger traffic continued, further driving the need for new aircraft to satisfy growth as well as replacement needs of the airlines worldwide.

The International Air Transport Association reported for 2018 industrywide revenue passenger kilometers were up 6.5% with load factors of the 82%. Looking ahead, IATA is forecasting RPK growth in 2019 of about 6%. As someone who has been in the industry for five decades, I can tell you that this growth is impressive and further demonstrates that air travel really has become the world’s form of mass transportation with room for additional expansion as economies mature and middle classes continue to grow. Air Lease has been working diligently to help our myriad of airline customers in all regions of the world modernize their fleet and craft strategically plans as they look to expand their operations.

We’ve achieved a number of milestone deliveries just over the last few months. For example on widebody aircraft, we delivered the first 787-9 to Air Tahiti Nui and EVA in Taiwan. We delivered our first A330-900neo aircraft in December two TAP Air Portugal. For narrowbody aircraft we delivered the first A321neo to Air New Zealand, the first Boeing 737 MAX in Russia to S7 Airlines, which will be operated by the their unit Globus AirLines, the first 737 MAX aircraft that Cayman Airways, making the airline the first MAX operator in the Caribbean and the first Boeing 737 MAX 9 aircraft to Samoa Airways, making them the premier MAX operator of -9s to the South Pacific region.

We take pride in being at the forefront of introducing new aircraft types to specific airline customers or regions and these are just a few examples of our success in doing so. This spring we’re delivering the first of eight new A320neo LR long range aircraft to Aer Lingus. The first of six A321new LRs to Air Arabia and the first of four A321neo LRs to Air Astana. Additionally, we just signed the first three new A321neo LR leases with SAS, Scandinavian Airline System. Over the past few months we’ve also announced meaningful placements with both new and longtime customers.

At the end of November, we announced a very important placement of 15 new narrowbody Airbus aircraft to Vistara, a new customer, an Indian full-service airline that is a joint venture between the Tata group in India and Singapore airlines. We remain very, very selective about our placements in India, but we have not written off this market. As with any placement, it is important to evaluate the circumstances, but ultimately we will support a quality well-run and well-financed airline. According to IATA, India’s domestic market recorded the fastest full year domestic growth rate for the fourth quarter in a row of almost 19%. India has incredible growth opportunities ahead and we feel that Tata Group’s footprint in India and Singapore Airlines’ vast expertise will allow this airline to be successful for many years to come both operating domestic Indian routes as well as regional international routes.

Then in January we delivered the first of what will be the 12 new A321neo aircraft to Vietnam Airlines one of the fastest growing airlines in Asia. ALC has a two-decade relationship with Vietnam Airlines during which we played an instrumental role in helping them design their fleet plans and position them for success. And these A321neo placements were integral for us to continue that relationship with the important carrier Vietnam Airlines. This spring we’ll also be delivering Vietnam Airlines the first of eight Boeing 787-10 aircraft from Air Lease.

We have three new A330 900neo airline customers in the first half of 2019 starting with Air Mauritius and four more deliveries to TAP Air Portugal in the coming weeks. So as you can see, our team continues to work diligently to find the right deals with the airlines that we believe will succeed long-term with our aircraft. We focus relentlessly on airline credit quality. I think it’s very important to point out that many of the macro factors that impact airlines and create headlines, whether it be oil prices or foreign exchange movements for example do not necessarily directly impact the performance and profitability of the aircraft lessors, nor does it change the value or support we can provide to our customers as they adjust to a changing operating environment.

As John mentioned earlier, we are no stranger to the fact that we operate in an industry where airline failures are the norm year-after-year. We remain extremely vigilant, adequately protecting ourselves with cash security deposits, reserves and economically justifiable lease rates and we move quickly when we feel that situation is unfolding that could have negative consequences. As a result we’re proud to say that despite over 200 airline failures of all sizes since ALC was formed in 2010, our Company has taken zero, I repeat, zero credit loss during the last nine years. Our $26 billion order book represents only roughly 3% of the total capital needed to fund the industry’s $800 billion of aircraft deliveries between 2019 through 2023.

The needs within our industry are quite large and there is no requirement that we transact with airlines or in regions where we do not feel that success can be achieved via a long-term lease on one of our modern aircraft. We have the opportunity to be extremely selective, opportunistic on placements which should allow ALC to continue to differentiate its financial performance from the competition, especially players in the sale-leaseback market who have been deploying capital less strategically. ALC stands out among aircraft lessors and our airline customers and these customers can testify to that in the coming periods.

And with that I will turn the call over to our CFO Greg Willis to provide an update on ALC’s financing activities for the quarter ended December 31, 2018.

Gregory B. Willis — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thank you Steve. As mentioned earlier, we recorded another great quarter and full year results. Our results were largely driven by our net growth in our fleet with our key portfolio metrics of portfolio yield, lease term remaining and average age all remaining constant. For the fourth quarter of 2018, ALC generated revenues of approximately $450 million, up almost 13% year-over-year, including $437 million of rentals and $13 million of aircraft sales trading and other activities. As John noted our fleet activity included the purchase of 12 new aircraft, representing $881 million of aircraft investment and sales proceeds of $164 million. Included in aircraft sales trading and other is approximately $5 million of management fees and $4 million of gains on sales.

Turning to expenses, you’ll see that our interest expense increased year-over-year primarily due to the rise in average debt balances, which drives the growth in our fleet. Despite the rise in prevailing interest rates over the last year, our composite rate only increased 26 basis points over the last 12 months. This is primarily attributable to us maintaining a very high level of fixed rate debt, which currently stands at 86% of our debt portfolio. Year-over-year depreciation continues to track the growth of our fleet and SG&A represented approximately 5.8% of revenues as compared to 6.4% of revenues for the fourth quarter of last year. We continue to expect that over time our revenue growth will outpace our SG& A growth.

We run a highly efficient organization with 97 employees, servicing now $18.5 billion in total assets and we see this efficiency driving shareholder value into the future. We continue to benefit from tax reform through the reduction of the corporate tax rate. ALC ended 2018 with an effective tax rate of 20.2% as a result of the effects of tax reform. Looking forward to 2019 we expect to deliver 80 aircraft, representing approximately $6.5 billion in aircraft investments. As of today, we’re expecting $1.4 billion in Q1, $2.8 billion in Q2, $1.7 billion in Q3 and $680 million in Q4. We expect the deliveries in the first quarter be weighted toward the second half of the quarter.

We will continue to evaluate sales opportunities throughout 2019 and we currently anticipate selling approximately $1 billion of aircraft with the majority of this volume occurring in the second, third and fourth quarters of the year. Currently we have six aircraft remaining to be transferred to Thunderbolt II, which we expect to be transferred by the end of the second quarter.

ALC continues to click rentals for those aircraft that have not yet been transferred into Thunderbolt II and therefore we anticipate that based on how the timing of held-form-sale accounting works, most of the gains on the remaining aircraft will be accounted for in the rental line item as opposed to gain on sale line. However there is no change to our overall economics of the deal that we finalized back in August.

Moving to the financing side our business, as always we evaluate and seek out the most cost-efficient financing for ALC. In the fourth quarter we found that the bank market be extremely receptive allowing us to raise additional capital from October to February. And in early January, ALC completed our inaugural issuance of our medium-term note program which provides us significant flexibility in regards to the issuance timing and global market access, ultimately raising $700 million in senior unsecured notes at 4.25%. ALC maintained a strong liquidity position of $4.3 billion at year-end.

As of today, our next bond maturity is not until January 2020. We ended the year with slightly below our 2.5 times debt to equity target at 2.4 times, which is largely a result of our $200 million convertible note, maturing on December 1, 2018. We anticipate returning to our debt-to-equity target in 2019 and I would remind you that while 2.5 times is our target (inaudible) and we regularly to fluctuate above and below this level based on the timing of aircraft investments and sales. We also remain committed to our financing strategies of 80% fixed rate debt and 90% unsecured debt and again ended the year benefiting from the three investment grade ratings all with stable outlook.

As we plan for the remainder of 2019 we anticipate that $6.5 billion in aircraft investments between now and the end of the year will be funded for $3 billion to $4 billion in debt financing, $1 billion of aircraft sales and the balance coming from operating cash flow. I would like to highlight the strength of our operating cash flow, which is up 18% year-over-year driven by the growth in our fleet. This is the heart of the highly contractual nature of our assets, which provides for a clear path for growth and visibility to our shareholders.

This concludes my review of the results and the financing activities of the Company and I’ll now turn it back to Mary Liz.

Mary Liz DePalma — Head of Investor Relations

Thank you Greg. This concludes management remarks. For the question-and-answer session, each participant will be allowed one question and one follow up. I’d like to turn the call over to the operator to open the line for the Q& A session.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from Vincent Caintic with Stephens.

Vincent Caintic — Stephens — Analyst

Hi, thanks and good afternoon guys. Just first a broad overview question as we’re going into 2019. Just wondering if you can highlight anything you expect to be different? Any trends that you are looking to 2019 versus what we’ve seen in 2018?

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Well I would just comment that it doesn’t appear that we’re going to see, although it’s very hard to predict, the fuel price volatility we saw in 2018 — look nobody can make any guarantees but I think that that might be a bit different. We had a spike in currency fluctuation as well in 2018. And again that seems to appear to have a more stable outlook as well as a more stable interest rate outlook. I mean as we are going into 2018 mid-year there was a lot more forecast of rising interest rates, the Fed that was much more hawkish. Now that tone has changed, but I think from the some acceptance of our remarks — hopefully in our prepared remarks you see that overall we see continued growth and stability in the overall marketplace and with our airline customers. So, we have no real aspects that we can tell that’s going to be fundamentally negative or any different than what we’ve outlined.

Vincent Caintic — Stephens — Analyst

Okay great thank you. And on that point about rate, so the Fed has stopped rising interest rates, but just wondering if you expect to see rates — lease rates expand from what Fed has raised? And then also any views on cost of funds? You had a recent debt issuance, I think that was — I read a very good spread, but your thoughts on the lease rates into 2019 and then the impact to cost of funds?

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy — Executive Chairman of the Board

Well look lease rate factors have been pretty stable and consistent on our forward placements over the last several months. Ultimately as we’ve always said, a rising interest rate environment does work its way through the leasing sector, any financial sector. We expect that to be true. There is always a lag. Yes there is a competitive factors, but at the end of the day over a longer period of time, lease rates do follow interest rate. So I don’t see any change.

Gregory B. Willis — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

And then on the financing side our business we maintain a lot of activity to be opportunistic. We recognize there will be several windows to access capital and we like to be in a position where we can take advantage to those as you saw do in January. I think looking back in the fourth quarter, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we accessed the unsecured term loan market and took down approximately $600 million at LIBOR plus 112, which was a fantastic deal for us. And I think you’re going to — looking forward you’re going to see us remain opportunistic to take advantages of those windows and those markets when they present themselves.

Vincent Caintic — Stephens — Analyst

Okay, great. Thanks so much guys.

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks Vincent.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Moshe Orenbuch with Credit Suisse, your line is now open.

Moshe Orenbuch — Credit Suisse — Analyst

Great, thanks. I think that you did talk about the amount of CapEx in 2019 obviously being not just a surprise, but being at a higher level. And Greg how are you going to finance it? Just talk a little bit maybe about what that might do if you think about carrying that out to the end of the year in terms of your other metrics in terms of what it would mean for the growth rate in the fleet and perhaps age and related metrics?

Gregory B. Willis — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Okay. I mean in terms of our portfolio metrics, we don’t see a change. Looking at our deliveries that are in the pipeline, we don’t see a meaningful change in our portfolio lease yield, our age or our average lease term remaining. On the financing side also we’re keeping our target of 2.5 to 1 as we have for many years. Clearly we’ll go up and down around that target, but there is no change to the outlook there as well.

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy — Executive Chairman of the Board

The only thing I want to add to what Greg is said is that on the new aircraft delivering this year, the lease terms are longer and on the aircraft they will be selling. So most of our new leases are generally running 12 years, some have slightly shorter terms but the used aircraft we’re selling obviously have much shorter lease terms remaining.

Moshe Orenbuch — Credit Suisse — Analyst

Got it. Thanks Steve and John you had talked a little bit about the potential for some of the delays kind of continuing for deliveries into 2019. Any discussion about the benefits that you might receive in return or any kind of remedies? Thanks

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

No. Look we obviously we have huge relationships with both Airbus and Boeing. So we don’t comment on specifics as to what remedies we might have. I would just say that we actually look at this with two very focused eyes. Of course the first focus is on our own Company and impacts of any delays, which you’ve seen us in the past we’ve deployed CapEx where we’ve had significant delays in the aircraft. I think the overall delays are less than they were last year, but they’re still continuing. We’re still getting notices. But the second and I would say more important aspect not minimizing impact to Air Lease because I think we know how to deal with that from our own book, our own business. I’m more concerned about our customers frankly and that’s where the biggest impact is.

And we hate to have customers that have problems because of engine problems or they were — they put an aircraft in their fleet schedule as of May 1 and now they’re not going to get it until June or July and they miss the whole summer season. Frankly that’s our biggest focus is our customers. We can take care of our own but it’s our customers and it’s our job to try and do that. And we spent a great deal, a great deal amount of time this past year trying to help our customers, working with them with the manufacturers, trying to get them relief (inaudible) extending leases even to the extent of finding other aircraft from other leasing companies that we might be able to plug in to fill any gap. So I would say the biggest concern in exercise remains just taking care of our customers.

Moshe Orenbuch — Credit Suisse — Analyst

Okay. Thanks very much.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Scott Valentin with Compass Point. Your line is now open.

Scott Valentine — Compass Point — Analyst

Thank you and good afternoon. Just a follow-up question. John I think you talked about sale leaseback market. I guess it’s been a lot of market capital you know pushing down returns there. You commented about it deteriorating a little bit. Does that mean there’s capital coming into the market or you’re still seeing a very competitive environment there?

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

And frankly I think some of the lease rates, the returns have spooked people and you just have don’t have as much robust interest and people just have to be able to make a decent buck on their deployed capital and right now in the most aggressive parts of the sale leaseback market, that’s not achievable. So, I think nature takes its course and I just think — listen we’re not in the sale leaseback market so it’s wrong for us to say that we know every transaction, we don’t. But we keep track as closely possible we can. And we just don’t see as much frothiness that we did last year or the year before. I think people make their decisions and you do have market bottoms and I think we’ve reached it on the sale-leaseback site.

Gregory B. Willis — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The other issues Scott on the sale leasebacks is that we saw a lot of lessors did not exercise the kind of discipline that we do on things like deposits upfront, maintenance reserves, technical return conditions. And also what we found is that many of the sale leaseback lessors made unrealistic assumptions on residual values to kind of mathematically justify the low lease rates. And we just don’t engage in that type of assumptions.

Scott Valentine — Compass Point — Analyst

Okay. And then just a follow-up, does the weaker sale leaseback market have any impact on used aircraft values? Do you see that spilling over into demand for used aircraft in the secondary market?

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

The new aircraft sale leaseback suite are not — do not correlate to the used market whatsoever. It’s two different segments in a market.

Gregory B. Willis — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

I think you’ve seen a lot of activity in the used sales market. So, I don’t think you’re seeing that type of spill over.

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

What we are saying Scott is continued extensions of aircraft that are eight to 12 years old where airlines come to us and say “Look we have a lease coming off in 2019 or 2020 or even ’21, we’d like to extend those leases, three, four, five more years.” We’re seeing that a lot of that going on right now, especially since the oil prices have moderated a bit from their highs in 2018.

Scott Valentine — Compass Point — Analyst

All right. Thanks very much.

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

You’re welcome.

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy — Executive Chairman of the Board

Thanks Scott.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Michael Linenberg with Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open.

Michael Linenberg — Deutsche Bank — Analyst

Hey, John and Steve just a couple here. When we look at what’s going on with a carrier in India and one in Brazil and thankfully it looks like you’re not involved in either situations but it does look like we’re seeing at testing here of Cape Town. And I’m just — I’m just curious that your thoughts kind of the picture I think in the past from you guys have been pretty upfront about the limitations of Cape Town and maybe there is a lesson that we learn here. Some big picture takeaways in both those jurisdictions that we are currently watching play out?

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Look I’ll only comment that we at Air Lease have never relied I guess is the proper word, we have never relied on the trappings of Cape Town, its effectiveness especially in all these other jurisdictions and all I can say is you see what you see. And but never ever do we ever rely on just a purely legal point for the securitization and our risk mitigation. If you are down to having to rely on Cape Town you haven’t done your homework.

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy — Executive Chairman of the Board

My opinion is much stronger John, but I’m going to voice it.

Michael Linenberg — Deutsche Bank — Analyst

That’s fine. and then just my second Steve and John look you guys — you think back a few years now. I mean we’re going back to late ’90s, 2000 then we saw some of the noise limitation rules put into fact and the reason I’m bringing that up is I believe January 1, 2020 we see (inaudible) implementation kick in. I know it’s on a voluntary basis, but as you know this has to do with carbon footprints and airlines who participate having to make some payments and obviously I think it’s become mandatory maybe 2024, 2025.

But when I think back with the noise limitations that went into effect, there was a significant impact on values of aircraft either that weren’t stage three compliant. And I’m just curious as we see some of these environmental regulations kick in where people have now start paying for the carbon offset. Do we see more — a similar impact on some of the older aircraft? Or is it more gradual that you think over the next few years?

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Mike I think it validates our strategy of putting our asset into the youngest and most environmentally friendly aircraft. We have seen regulations where it is age limits. Some countries say if an airplane is older than 15 years old, it can’t be imported. We’ve seen the impact of taxation and fees imposed on European airlines. We think that trend will continue. So I think the way to differentiate ourselves is to offer the airlines the best airplanes that counteract that particular cost and then redeploy some of the middle-aged aircraft in other regions of the world that are not yet impacted by those type of regulations.

Gregory B. Willis — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Mike I have one other thought. Keep in mind that if you look at the next — the latest — the most modern generation of aircraft the neos, the MAXs, the 787, the A330, if you just look at the sheer volume and quality of those aircraft that are delivered to date and even over the next five years it is still a small fraction of the global fleet. So my only point in saying that is that any aircraft that isn’t of that yield for example the 737-800, a wonderful bread and butter aircraft worldwide, even the 777-300ER, the current A330ceo and 321ceo, these aircraft are not going to lose value overnight. It will take a tremendous amount of time for the global fleet to replenish and reup the new aircraft types, a long amount of time. So despite what regulations are etcetera, the reality is that used aircraft values are not going to drop off the cliff.

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy — Executive Chairman of the Board

I made the math Michael is simple. There’s almost 25,000 jest now, Western build jets that are over 100 seats and you know what their production rates are at Airbus, Boeing, Embraer, there is no way that say in the next five to seven years, there’ll be less than 10,000 new airplanes built. You’ll have several thousand airplanes will retire or be converted to freighters. So as John said this is a long-term process regardless of these regulatory constraints.

Michael Linenberg — Deutsche Bank — Analyst

Okay, all right, thanks gentlemen. I appreciate it.

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks Mike.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Kristine Liwag with Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Kristine Liwag — Bank of America Merrill Lynch — Analyst

John and Steve your China exposure as a percent of net book value is the lowest we’ve seen in the past few years and it looks like at the end of the quarter at 17%. Can you discuss what’s driving the shift away from China? And you can you provide more color on the activity that you are seeing here?

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. I think it’s pretty clear Kristine. There is no shift away. This was a — our China business has been building over the past five, six, seven years. We’ve had great success in China and this simply is a product of our overall fleet growing, our replacements in other areas, you will see continued placements in China from us this year. That business is going well. But look we are growing bigger. Our balance sheet this year is going to be excess of $20 billion and it was always a plan as we mapped out our strategy. It was always our plan that China was going to be reducing in total over time. And our plan is occurring exactly as we anticipated it. It’s not knee-jerk reaction to trade tensions or anything else like that rather it’s a result of four to five to six years of planning and looking forward at our placements and our overall fleet growth is just getting bigger in the world.

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy — Executive Chairman of the Board

Yes so you’ll continue to see Kristine China and if you include Hong Kong and Macau we’ll probably hover around one-sixth of our fleet. So somewhere between say 15% and 18% in that range for the foreseeable future.

Kristine Liwag — Bank of America Merrill Lynch — Analyst

That’s helpful. And then with your lease placements pretty high now for 2020. When you look at the contracts that you’ve signed there, what does your net book value look like by region by the end of 2020? Where do you expect to see the uptick in growth?

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Well it’s not going to be tremendously different from what we have today. Generally speaking it’s going to be 42%, 43% overall in Asia. And we’ve talked about our current percentage I think is for 17% of that is for China. You’re going to have Europe which has been growing quite nicely for us a little north of 30%. And then you’re going to have you’re going to have the Middle East and other areas all fall normally. So it’s not going to be a tremendous diversity from our distribution today in our net book value.

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy — Executive Chairman of the Board

Yes. You’ll probably see a small pick up a few decimal points in Latin America and Caribbean because of new deliveries. For example we just announced four new MAXs at Caribbean Airlines and we have three more deliveries to Cayman Airways and we have some other transactions in South America. So we see a little increase there. I think Europe will probably grow faster than our total fleet average. But again as John said it will not deviate very much from where it was at the end of the year.

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. The one think and the Benoit of the U.S. tax reform, we have placed more aircraft in U.S. And so you may see our US content up a few percentage points. Just by way of reminder tax reform allows us to take the full amount of the aircraft cost in one year in the first year if we place it — whether it’s Airbus or going if we place it in service for the U.S. operator. So that is — we can do the math on that and we can tax effect that and that gives us a little bit extra stimulus for the U.S. But you’re not going to see a huge quantum of growth.

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy — Executive Chairman of the Board

I think one last thing to point out though moving from regions to maybe individual customer concentrations. I think from a risk standard point our average customer concentration is below 2%. We’re running an incredibly diversified both airline customers and we do so very prudently with very strong security factors.

Kristine Liwag — Bank of America Merrill Lynch — Analyst

That’s helpful. And then if I could squeeze one last one. We were doing some work on the global in-service fleet and it looks like there could be a widebody placement coming in the mid-2020s particularly in the U.S. Now with your business model the U.S. hasn’t been a big factor for growth for you. And also U.S. airlines have very many avenues to get capital. Do you think that — what do you think would have to change in the industry for you to play a part of that widebody replacement in the U.S.? Do you think that could be an area of growth? And what you think has to happen for you to be a player there?

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy — Executive Chairman of the Board

Well as you know American Delta and United, which are the major widebody operators of passenger aircraft have all placed significant orders with Boeing, Airbus. Delta as you know has a lot of A330-900s coming, A350 fleet has been placed to 747s. United has A350-900s and a lot of 787-9s and 787-10s. American has up there 787 order last year for both as -8s to replace or 767s and -9s. I think United still get a few more 777-300ER. So I think the U.S. carriers have actually topped up pretty nicely on their widebody orders for 2019, ’20, ’21, ’22. I don’t see a lot of opportunities for Air Lease on the widebody side in the domestics. I think our main emphasis in the U.S. will be on single-aisle aircraft like 737 MAX A320, A321neos. I would say that’s where we will focus our U.S. business in the next couple of years.

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

I think a global picture Kristine I’ll make a comment — I think I might’ve made at your conference and that is if you look forward, right now the largest twin aisle widebodies have been a little slow. For example it’s no secret the 777x from Boeing has been slow in sales (inaudible) etcetera. But at the end of the day there is a huge replacement market in the ’22 through ’25 time frame where the youngest 777-200ERs will be replaced the oldest 777-300ERs will be replaced, any remaining A340s and et cetera and a aircraft like that. So I do think you will see a pickup in the largest widebody growth in that period just simply as a reflection our retirement of the large widebodies of the types I just mentioned.

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy — Executive Chairman of the Board

There’s still 747 is that airlines like Qantas and British Airways in Asia so as John says we see the international segment on our widebody activity as being the most active.

Kristine Liwag — Bank of America Merrill Lynch — Analyst

Great, thank you guys.

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

You’re welcome.

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy — Executive Chairman of the Board

You’re welcome.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jamie Baker with JPMorgan, your line is now open.

Nish Mani — JPMorgan — Analyst

Hi, good afternoon guys, this is Nish Mani on for Jamie. I was wondering if you could comment a little bit on the supply side dynamics. Obviously traffic market demand remains strong and you noted that (inaudible) a pickup with the airline bankruptcies and shutdowns, but how did the supply side factor into this? I mean is it your view is that Boeing and Airbus have the production rates kind of roughly in balance with how you think about demand in 2019 and ’20?

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Well I think the overall answer is yes. We believe in the duopoly is still rational etcetera. However we remain concerned because the supply chain is — they are very constrained and increasing rates is very very tough. In our own business we find delays and sometimes in getting seats. We find delays in other aspects, sometimes just getting even engines in and out of the shop at the MROs, they’re fully booked and we don’t have to do it, our airline customers do it, but we work with them et cetera.

All across the board sometimes in the new aircraft programs and our deliveries, we get notices delays not because of an engine, but because some widget or component is in short supply or they have replace it etcetera. So there is just a lot of I think vulnerability and I know that the OEMs themselves echo supreme confidence in their ability to do this. I’m just telling you we remain concerned because of things we see and hear and watch every day with our customers and with our deliveries. So, we have the people on the ground to lose and in Seattle and everywhere our technical people monitor availabilities everywhere, our whole materials management group, which supplies all of the avionics, seats, (inaudible), wheels, tires, brakes for aircraft, monitor availability and when could we get in and what we’re going to change an aircraft from A and B. So, all I’d say is, it’s pretty tight and any one single thing could be a disruption. We’ve seen that in Airbus. So look it’s not — I’m saying as — we say this for a long time it’s not so slam dunk in our review.

Gregory B. Willis — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The other thing we’re watching is the quality of the backlog from buyers like jet Airways and Norwegian and Lion Air and VHF and others. The question is can these airlines absorb all of the planes that they’ve ordered? Well some of those orders transform into options. Will other people step into those positions? So, that’s something we monitor very, very closely. But as 2019 unfolds, we see pretty solid situation of equilibrium between production and demand.

Nish Mani — JPMorgan — Analyst

Okay. That’s very helpful and very thorough, thank you both guys and just one kind of follow up on a slightly unrelated topic. You mentioned that at this point in the cycle lease durations are taking up relative to kind of the past few years. Is there any color you could provide on how this kind of uptick in lease duration shifts between business models? In other words are low-cost carriers and kind of more traditional hub and spoke carriers treated differently as you think about the push and pull of longer lease duration, potentially lower lease rates on a nominal basis and thanks again.

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Part of the longer duration is not a financial reason. It is that the maintenance intervals that Airbus and Boeing have been able to get from the regulators have been extended. I’ll give you a small example. On the 737, going from 800 to a MAX the first heavy check is now nine years instead of eight years. So same thing on the 787, the A350. The intervals for heavy airframe maintenance have gone longer. So many of the airlines want to match the lease with the maintenance check that’s due at that point in time.

Nish Mani — JPMorgan — Analyst

So it is fair to characterize then that if the maintenance check intervals had not changed, the lease be duration probably wouldn’t take either in your view? (inaudible).

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Well I would say that’s a significant component obviously the maintenance intervals. But part of it I think you alluded to earlier is of course that an airline’s request to get the lowest resets possible, it’s no secret that the longer the other duration is and lease, all leasing companies price lower. That’s just always been the case. And so and we’re happy to do that. We take that trade all day along and we would always bias toward a longer lease rate like I think most lessors would.

Gregory B. Willis — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes, we got some 14-year leases on widebody aircraft.

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

There was really nothing new here but I think — I do think that all these factors rate versus duration, expanding intervals and then the other thing is if you just look forward at again the production rates and the supply chain etcetera, etcetera securing an aircraft for a longer period of time these days especially if you are a growing operator, you really need to have growing LCC or ULCC, you’re adding aircraft quickly. It’s good to secure for a long period of time and you just take away forward risk.

Gregory B. Willis — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

It also shows they have more confidence in the future.

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

We just did a deal with an airline in Europe that traditionally was doing 8 to 10-year leases and we signed up for 13-year leases. And again it ties in with both economics and the maintenance intervals.

Nish Mani — JPMorgan — Analyst

Okay that makes sense. As always guys, thank you so much for the time. I would appreciate it.

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Okay, thanks.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Josh Sullivan with Seaport Global, your line is now open.

Josh Sullivan — Seaport Global — Analyst

Hi, good afternoon.

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Hi Josh.

Josh Sullivan — Seaport Global — Analyst

What other thoughts on the middle of the market aircraft at this point? What characteristics would make it more attractive for your portfolio? And I guess what might make it less attractive for whatever the final design ends up looking like?

Gregory B. Willis — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Well look I think the NMA, I believe Dennis Muilenburg in their earnings call Boeing said they’ve sort of pushed off this decision to 2020. As I indicated my prepared remarks there’s many key decisions we made. The engine obviously is one the key of the all. Look it’s a business case question for Boeing. There is some interest in the aircraft. On the other hand when you look at the single-aisle products and the twin-aisle products available today, they cover it. You can’t an argument for example on the Airbus side that between the A321Neo and LR neo and possibly the a 321 XLRneo and the A330neo that gap is covered.

So, look I think it’s nothing more than what we’ve always said which is — it’s an economic equity. What is the price of the aircraft will tell you how many potential units we think that there is. And so it’s just too early to — it’s really too early to tell. Some people have said this could be the first twin-aisle aircraft for the ULCC market, that maybe the case. On the other hand, a lot of the major carriers around the world are looking at it. That’s a matter of availability as well, I mean how long do you wait for it. So, it’s still unknown. I mean the very fact that Boeing hasn’t gone forward yet doesn’t mean anything more than they are still studying at very very close with their potential business partners. And there is a lot of aircraft choice available today, but cost drives everything and price drives everything.

Josh Sullivan — Seaport Global — Analyst

And then just one on Thunderbolt. What other hurdles you are looking at before may be launching another Thunderbolt at this point?

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

I think right now we’re going to the math of optimizing the portfolio running the traps with the various constituencies, rating agencies, bankers and these deals take a bit of time to pull together. So we’re trying to optimize what’s the right portfolio to be put in next and we’re (inaudible) values for Air Lease going forward.

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy — Executive Chairman of the Board

But we have a whole team dedicated to doing that and we are looking forward to with great optimism.

Josh Sullivan — Seaport Global — Analyst

Okay, great. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Rajeev Lalwani with Morgan Stanley, your line is now open.

Rajeev Lalwani — Morgan Stanley — Analyst

Jonathan on for Rajeev. I was wondering if you would come back to the delivery delays? And I was wondering if you would modify the impact? In the last quarter you provided some color there. And then as it relates to Boeing are those delays largely resolved?

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Boeing I think we’re in good shape. Airbus changes by the day. So, I think for us to give you any quantitative data on days or weeks of delays would be —

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy — Executive Chairman of the Board

I do think — I commented earlier that delays so far this year are less in magnitude than last year. That’s true, but they’re still happening and I think last year we said delays were three to four months on average, they’re probably little bit less now. But I think the point we’re simply trying to make is that they are still coming. We’re still getting delay notices and it’s just — we’re working through it. We do have confidence in Airbus manager, they are working their industrial plan. We just don’t think it’s over yet.

Gregory B. Willis — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Right. And we give you in my prepared remarks we went through where we expect in terms of dollar value of aircraft investment by quarter throughout 2019. So, you have a — should have a pretty good base of where we see deliveries as of today. And obviously that was a good change, but I think that’s the plan as we see it today.

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, the both delivery — on the both the 787 and 737 MAX are generally on time. The A350 is running pretty well on schedule, but the A330neo and A320, A321neos that’s where we have the biggest issues and we are working with Airbus on a daily basis.

Rajeev Lalwani — Morgan Stanley — Analyst

Great. Thanks for the color there. As it relates to the order book just at a high level what’s the current stance on adding additional aircraft? And the potential enemies play a factor?

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Well look we added — in the middle of 2015 we added a significant order for with the Boeing company primarily on single-aisle aircraft and the MAXs. And that is just part of our ongoing day-to-day business. We have no — we can’t — there’s no current — there’s no current plans in terms of the new technology aircraft that’s still very much under study. So it’s just premature at this point to comment on the NMA or any of the new aircraft type at this point.

Rajeev Lalwani — Morgan Stanley — Analyst

Got it, that’s fair. Thanks.

Operator

Thank you. That was our final question in queue. I would like to turn it back to Ms. DePalma for closing remarks.

Mary Liz DePalma — Head of Investor Relations

Okay. Thank you everyone. That’s it for our call today and look forward to speaking with you again after the conclusion of the first quarter. James you can now disconnect the lines. Thank you very much.

Operator

Thank you ladies and gentlemen. That does conclude today’s conference. You may now disconnect. Have a wonderful day.

Duration: 59 minutes

Call participants:

Mary Liz DePalma — Head of Investor Relations

John L. Plueger — President and Chief Executive Officer

Steven F. Udvar-Hazy — Executive Chairman of the Board

Gregory B. Willis — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Vincent Caintic — Stephens — Analyst

Moshe Orenbuch — Credit Suisse — Analyst

Scott Valentine — Compass Point — Analyst

Michael Linenberg — Deutsche Bank — Analyst

Kristine Liwag — Bank of America Merrill Lynch — Analyst

Nish Mani — JPMorgan — Analyst

Josh Sullivan — Seaport Global — Analyst

Rajeev Lalwani — Morgan Stanley — Analyst

More AL analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company’s SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.